Cardboard boxes are greener than plastic alternatives?

Author: EIS Release Date: Aug 30, 2021

Carton packaging for small electrical goods has a lower carbon footprint than plastic alternatives, according to Pro Carton, the European association for carton and cartonboard manufacturers, which is highlighting a report written by the bio-economy unit of the Research Institutes of Sweden (RISE).

 

Cartonboard is an industry name for non-corrugated cardboard or packaging card.

 

The research compares the cradle-to-grave carbon footprint of the complete packaging around a product, rather than comparing materials by weight.

 

 

“It’s known that the carbon impact per tonne of material is much lower for cartonboard than polymers regardless of whether you look just at fossil emissions or also take the biogenic emissions and removals into consideration,” said Pro Carton general manager Tony Hitchin. “We wanted to compare products on a per-unit basis as cartonboard packaging may not weigh the same as a fossil-based solution. Furthermore, the conversion and end-of-life impacts for each of the solutions will be different. That’s why in this study we have compared specific packaging solutions for the similar products on a cradle-to-grave basis.”

 

 

 

Cradle-to-grave comparisons include everything from mining or growing the raw materials to final disposal.

 

The study reports both fossil green-house-gas (GHG) emissions from non-renewable sources and biogenic GHG emissions and removals – removals are from atmospheric CO2 used by photosynthesis for biomass growth.

 

“Whilst the unique aspects of the life-cycle of fibre-based packaging are taken into account when calculating the total carbon footprint, we also wanted to see what the results would be when only the fossil GHG emissions were considered,” said Hitchin.